![]() I did it before with the cipher of the Bavarian Illuminati, applying it to the names and specific phrases in Greenfield's book. Leo Gillis' Trigrammaton Qabalah, or even Frater RIKB's Mars Kamea Gematria - or any other cipher you could think of - we will always find "meaningful" matches when we use this kind of ciphers to decode anything we want. Whether it be Simple/Ordinal, or John Farthing's Toavotea Key, or R. What if we used a completely different cipher - would we still be able to find "meaningful matches"?Īnd the answer to this is an absolute YES. Greenfield's "Secret Cipher of the UFOnauts", in which he proposes that EQ / ALW / NAEQ is the "secret cipher" of the UFOnauts - for the simple fact that he was able to find "meaningful matches" when applying it to the cases he was searching. One of the clearest examples of this can be found in Allen H. ![]() ![]() ![]() It is my firm belief that, whether it be UFOnauts, Thelemic texts or sacred scriptures, all ciphers will always deliver certain "meaningful" matches when we use them to "decode" those things. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |